Fiscal Consolidation, Fiscal Deficit :
Meaning, Implications, Explained Why Vijay Kelkar Committee was formed?
1.
Parts of Budget= Revenue + Expenditure
2.
Types of Budget= Deficit/Surplus/Balanced
3.
Why printing more money=Bad idea?
4.
When fiscal deficit NOT BAD?
5.
When & Why is fiscal deficit BAD?
1.
Creates inflation
2.
Black Money
3.
Bond Yield increased
4.
Crowding out investment
5.
Twin deficit hypothesis
6.
Current Account Deficit
7.
Subsidy Burden = fiscal deficit increased
8.
Interest Payment
9.
Vicious circle: Trade to Fiscal deficit
6.
Fiscal Consolidation: What is it?
7.
Mock Questions
Continuing
episodes of technical incorrect economy.
Set Location: Prime
Minister’s Office (PMO), New Delhi.
Mohan is busy uploading
(un)funny photos in his facebook album and tagging random friends in them to
get more “likes”. Vijay Kelkar makes an entry in his office.
Kelkar
|
Sir,
the expert reports suggest that fiscal deficit will be around 6 percent for
2012-13. This is very dangerous; you need do fiscal consolidation
immediately!
|
Mohan
|
Ya
but what is fiscal deficit and why is it dangerous?
|
Kelkar
|
What?
you’re an economist and yet you don’t know what is fiscal deficit?
|
Mohan
|
Well
I was an economist. But I didn’t maintain notes and I did
not revise the standard reference books either, so I’m unable to recall the
concepts right now,
|
Kelkar
|
Well
fiscal deficit (FD) = Budgetary Deficit + Market borrowing + other
liabilities of Government
|
Mohan
|
Please
Explain in English, from the very beginning.
|
Kelkar
|
Ok
then let us start from the
beginning.Every year, the Government puts out a plan for its income
and expenditure for the coming year. This is, called
annual Union Budget and you need to get it approved by the
parliament.
|
Mohan
|
Side
question: why do I need to get it approved by the parliament?
|
Kelkar
|
For
the answer Click ME
|
Mohan
|
Ok
back to the topic
|
Parts
of Budget: Revenue and Expenditure
Kelkar: In every budget,
there is incoming money (Revenue) and out going money (Expenditure).
Incoming
money
|
Outgoing
Money
|
Incoming money is
divided into two parts. Tax and Non Tax
And outgoing money is
divided into Plan and Non plan Expenditure.
Incoming
|
Outgoing
|
||
Tax
|
Non
Tax
|
Plan
|
Non
Plan
|
Kelkar: We can further refine
this classification into Revenue/capital receipts and Expenditure.
But let us not
complicate the matter for the time being.
Mohan: Now What is this
incoming money from tax and non tax sources?
Kelkar: see the table yourself
for the examples.
Incoming
money
|
Outgoing
|
|||
Tax
Revenue
|
Non
Tax Revenue
|
Plan
|
Non
Plan
|
|
Direct
Tax
|
Indirect
Tax
|
|||
1.
income tax
2.
Corporate tax;
3.
Wealth tax
4.
Capital gain tax
|
1.
custom duty,
2.
excise duty,
3.
service tax.
4.
VAT
|
1.
Fees Collected (Driving license,
RTI, Passport)
2.
Fines and Penalties (Traffic
violation etc)
3.
Income from PSU (e.g. profit from
Airindia (lolz)
4.
Gifts. (discussed in 2nd ARC
article)
5.
Grants (Foreign Aid from UN, Japan
etc)
|
Mohan: and what is this
outgoing money? Plan and non-plan?
Kelkar: Outgoing money = the
area where Government spends the money (Expenditure).
Plan-Expenditure means
spending money on the activities related to the national five year plan. (FYP)
Non-plan Expenditure,
obviously means spending money on activities that are not related with national
five year plan. Check the table for examples.
Incoming
|
Outgoing
|
|||
Tax
Revenue
|
Non
Tax Revenue
|
Plan
Expenditure
|
Non
Plan
|
|
Direct
Tax
|
Indirect
Tax
|
|||
1.
income tax
2.
Corporate tax;
3.
Wealth tax
4.
Capital gain tax (Vodafone case)
|
1.
custom duty,
2.
excise duty,
3.
service tax.
4.
VAT
|
1.
Fees Collected (Driving license,
RTI, Passport)
2.
Fines and Penalties (Traffic
violation etc)
3.
Income from PSU (e.g. profit from
Airindia (lolz)
4.
Gifts. (discussed in 2nd ARC
article)
5.
Grants (Foreign Aid from UN, Japan
etc)
|
1.
MNGREA
2.
Janani Suraksha Yojana
3.
JNNURM
4.
Indira Awas Yojana
|
1.
Salary of judges, bureaucrats and
armymen
2.
Buying new tanks and missiles
3.
Subsidies: Petrol, Kerosene etc.
4.
Light bills of Government offices.
5.
Luxury Travel bills of
Pratibha.
|
Mohan: ok so now what?
Kelkar: Now we classify the
budget according to the balance between incoming and outgoing money.
When
|
It
is called a
|
outgoing
money > incoming money
|
deficit
budget.
|
outgoing
money < incoming money
|
surplus
budget.
|
outgoing
money = incoming money
|
balanced
budget.
|
In reality, Government
always has deficit budget. Because
as long as there is
Pakistan and China in the neighborhood, we’ll have to maintain a huge army,
keep buying new tanks and missiles.
As long as there are
poor people, we’ll have to keep running various Government schemes.
Mohan: come to the point.
Kelkar: The point is,
When Government spends
beyond its aukaat, it creates a big pothole in the highway.
This pothole can be
called a Revenue deficit, budget deficit, fiscal deficit or primary deficit –
according to the formula you use to measure the depth of this pothole.
This pothole cannot be
filled with cement, asphalt or dirt. It can only be filled with cash.
In the 1980s, Sukhmoy
Chrokroborthy Committee came up with the fiscal deficit formula
Fiscal deficit=
1.
Budgetary deficit (=total Expenditure minus total income)
2.
+
market borrowings (=through Government securities (G-Sec)/Bond)
3.
+
other liabilities (e.g. pension and provident to be given in future)
Mohan: but why should we
calculate this fiscal deficit?
Kelkar: This fiscal
deficit number tells you the depth of the hole and gives you the idea how much money
do you need to borrow from the sources
within India (internal
borrowing – from RBI, Other banks etc)
and from abroad
(external borrowing- World Bank, IMF etc.)
Bigger the pothole, more
cash you need to fill it up.
Here is some food for thought. Incoming Outgoing Breakup for USA budget 2011. Click on Image to Enlarge.
Here is some food for thought. Incoming Outgoing Breakup for USA budget 2011. Click on Image to Enlarge.

Mohan
|
then
simply borrow money and fill up the pothole! What is the problem?
|
Kelkar
|
problem
is “Paisaa Ped pe toh nahi lagtaa” (Money doesn’t grow on
trees). When you borrow money, you’ve to pay interest (ब्याज) to the party, every year.To pay this interest in the
future, you’ve three options.first option =Increase the current taxes
or create new taxes.
|
Mohan
|
Not
a good idea sir-ji.
|
Kelkar
|
alright,
Second option =Create policies to help stimulate economic growth so that
tax collection automatically increases with it, like FDI in aviation,
power sector, retail, insurance and so on.
|
Mohan
|
But
that’s Easier said than done :(
|
Kelkar
|
Then
Third option : Print more currency and use it to fill up the pothole. This is
called debt monetization.
|
Mohan
|
Now
this third option sounds great :D
|
Kelkar
|
Actually
that’s the stupidest of all three solutions. Let me explain with the usual
example.
|
Suppose, Government
orders RBI to print lots of cash to solve poverty.
Then Government launches “Rajiv Gandhi Suitcase yojana (RGSY)” under which every BPL family is given a suitcase containing Rs.10 lakh.
What will happen then?
They’ll all go and buy lots of onion,milk,mobile, cars, houses everything.
=Demand of product will increase, but the supply will remain almost the same as earlier.
So, there will be one customer offering Rs.400 per kilo of onion, then another guy would offer Rs.500 per kilo of onion=inflation =not good.
Then Government launches “Rajiv Gandhi Suitcase yojana (RGSY)” under which every BPL family is given a suitcase containing Rs.10 lakh.
What will happen then?
They’ll all go and buy lots of onion,milk,mobile, cars, houses everything.
=Demand of product will increase, but the supply will remain almost the same as earlier.
So, there will be one customer offering Rs.400 per kilo of onion, then another guy would offer Rs.500 per kilo of onion=inflation =not good.
On the other hand,
Suppose your boss pays you 10 lakh per year, but that means he definitely
extracts work worth more than 10 lakhs from you and sells some goods/services
to a third client. That’s why giving you 10 lakhs doesn’t increase inflation. (because
some other client is buying the services you had produced).
but giving 10 lakh to a poor without making him economically productive = increases inflation.
but giving 10 lakh to a poor without making him economically productive = increases inflation.
Hence printing money to
solve problems= not good idea.
·
Here
is another example: Suppose that there is only one
commodity that everyone needs to buy in order to live a good
life say wheat.
·
Also,
assume that our country produces 10,000 quintals of wheat every year.
·
There
are a total of 25,000 people in the country who spend Rs. 400
each per year to buy wheat.
·
Since
this Rs. 1 crore is spent to purchase ten thousand quintals of wheat, the cost
of wheat is Rs. 1,000 per quintal.
·
Now
suppose that to repay some of its debt, the Government decides to print
some new currency notes. Say the Government prints new notes worth
Rs. 10 lacs.
·
This
means the amount of money available to spend increases
from Rs. 1 crore to Rs. 1.1 crores.
·
Since
the amount of wheat produced hasn’t increased, each tonne of
wheat now costs Rs. 1,100, a 10%
increase! (1.1 crores paid for ten thousand
quintals = Rs. 1,100 per quintal).
·
So
we have just seen that the effect of debt monetization is “inflation.”
·
Inflation
acts like an invisible tax on all the people of a country. (recall the first
option – increasing tax was not a good option.)
Mohan : Does that mean
fiscal deficit =bad?
Kelkar: not always bad.
It depends on the situation.
·
If
the money that the Government had borrowed was used to increase the amount of
wheat production, then the inflation could have been avoided. (for
example borrowing money to create new canal or irrigation project)
·
If
Such irrigation project led to an increase in wheat production from
10,000 quintals to 11,000 quintals.
·
In
that case, even with an increase of money to 1.1 crores, the cost of
wheat would remain steady at Rs. 1,000 per
quintal.
·
Thus
we’d have economic growth and also avoid inflation
·
Clearly
then, it was a good thing that the Government borrowed money to implement
this program.
Thus, fiscal deficit is
not necessarily a bad thing, always.
·
A
large and persistent fiscal deficit =something is wrong in the economy.
·
It
can mean that the Government is spending money on unproductive programmes
which do not increase economic productivity. (For example MNREGA, most of
the money is eaten midway by the Sarpanch and Local officers.) =Bad
·
Now
these rich Sarpanch and Local officers buy more gold, land and cars= demand
increased but other normal people don’t have that much money = inflation.
(demand pull type).
·
Fiscal
deficit= crudely speaking when incoming money is less and outgoing money is
more. So, incoming money is less = tax collection machinery is not effective =
perhaps lot of people are evading the taxes = black money =inflation (demand
pull type) = Very bad.
·
In
extreme conditions, inflation can give way to hyperinflation
that can completely destroy a country. =very bad.
From Eurozone Greece
Exit article, You already know what is bond yield. If not click me
When Government keeps
borrowing and borrowing to fill up the fiscal deficit pothole, then bond yield
will increase = not good because more and more of taxpayers’ money (i.e.
Government ‘s incoming money) will go in repaying that bond interest rate
rather than going into education or healthcare.
We already saw that,
Fiscal deficit pothole can only be filled with cash. This cash has to be
borrowed from RBI, other banks, FII etc. who buy the Government bonds.
So, that much money
(Credit/loan) is not available for other needy businessman.
thus fiscal deficit
“Crowds out”investment from private sector. Now that needy businessman will
have to borrow money at higher interest from another party (this is how
fiscal deficit increases ‘interest rates’)= input cost of product increased
= he will increase the MRP of his product or service to maintain the same
profit margin = inflation. (cost-push type)
·
This
hypothesis says that as the fiscal deficit of the country goes up its trade
deficit (i.e. the difference between exports and imports) also goes up.
·
Hence,
when a government of a country spends more than what it earns, the country also
ends up importing more than exporting.
·
In
India, the trade deficit story is basically about oil and gold – two
commodities that the country does not produce much but imports a hell of a lot.
·
When
India imports more than it exports = leads to Current Account Deficit. (we
already discussed it earlier,click
ME)
·
CAD
is another pothole but it can be filled only with foreign currency (mostly
dollars!)
·
This
increases the demand of dollars in Forex Market = rupee weakens against dollar=
price of petrol will increase= again inflation= bad.
·
the
government of India does not pass on a major part of the increase in the price
of oil to the end consumer and thus ‘subsidises’ diesel, LPG and kerosene .
·
So
oil companies sell at a loss, and the government compensates these companies
for the loss (by giving them bonds).
·
This
increases government expenditure, which, in turn, increases the fiscal deficit.
In this financial year
alone (2012-13), the government will pay more than 4 lakh crore just as
interest payment on debt taken earlier! = more imbalance between incoming and
outgoing money.
Thus, in India’s case, a
greater trade deficit also leads to a greater fiscal deficit. So the causality
in India’s case is both ways.
·
A
high fiscal deficit leads to higher trade deficit.
·
And
high trade deficit leads to higher fiscal deficit.
·
And
this, in turn, also leads to a weaker rupee, which, in turn, pushes up the cost
of oil in rupee terms — leading to a higher fiscal deficit.
Now in the opening
lines, Kelkar said Fiscal deficit would be around 6%. What does that mean?
There are two ways to
express Fiscal Deficit.
1.
Absolute
Value: Rs. 521,980 crores on March 31, 2012 .
2.
Percentage:
5.9% of GDP.
In newspapers and
economic discussions, the Fiscal is usually expressed in second form
(percentage).
·
You
might think 5 or 6% is such a trivial amount, why Kelkar is so worried?
·
Well,
to understand the gravity of the situation, you’ve to compare the percentage
with other percentages.
1.
Around
3.8% of India’s GDP goes in Education. (2012)
2.
Around
6% of India’s GDP goes in Fiscal Deficit. (2012)
3.
Greece’s
Fiscal deficit was more than 10% of its GDP and look how much trouble it is
facing. (recall Eurozone Article)
·
Therefore,
we must not only pay attention to the fiscal deficit, we must also try
and understand the different areas of Government spending.
·
Is
the Government borrowing money to spend on programmes that lead
to increased economic productivity or is it spending on
unproductive programs?
·
Remember,
even directly giving money (or amenities) to BPL, without making them
more economically productive = dangerous because of the various reasons
seen above.
Mohan
|
ok
so far I understood
1.
What is fiscal deficit.
2.
Why and when fiscal deficit is
bad.
But
what is this fiscal consolidation?
|
Kelkar
|
Fiscal consolidation means doing
everything to fix the fiscal deficit problem in its root and preventing heavy
fiscal deficits situation from occurring in future.
|
Mohan
|
But How can we do that?
|
Kelkar
|
Just try to reduce the outgoing
money and increase the incoming money. (Look at that plan-non plan table
again.)That means
1.
Cut down subsidies.
2.
Stop leakages in subsidies.
3.
Reform the tax structure
(implement GST).
4.
Improve the performance of PSUs.
5.
Recover blackmoney
6.
stop ministers from using Business
class airtickets and other wasteful Government expenditures. (= take
austerity measures)
+
Policy reforms such as FDI (to create environment conductive for economy =
that will automatically increase productivity and tax collection. Recall the
second option.)
|
Mohan
|
hmm that itself sounds like a
problem. I think I should make another Committee (so that I don’t
have to implement its recommendations). Let me check my phonebook for
retired judges.
|
Kelkar
|
Sir this is the matter of economy
not railway accidents. It requires an expert on economy.
|
Mohan
|
Then make a Committee headed by
Montek Singh
|
Kelkar
|
but Media won’t like his
recommendations. (Everyone who earns more than Rs.20 is not a BPL and
he should pay 10% income tax.)
|
Mohan
|
Then make a Committee headed by
some columnist from The H*****!
|
Kelkar
|
But Madam-ji wouldn’t like his
recommendations. (hand over Finance Ministry to Fidel Castro)
|
Mohan
|
Then whom should I appoint?
|
Kelkar
|
The expert is sitting in front of
you.
|
Mohan
|
Alright, tomorrow morning you goto
the finance Minister along with your class 10,12,college marksheets, extra-curricular
activity certificates and job experience certificates (if any) and get the
appointment letter from him.
|
Kelkar
|
What???
and
now you’re asking the Vijay Kelkar to submit his class 10-12
marksheets and extra curricular activity certificates?
|
Mohan
|
Chillx. I was joking. You may go
now. If I need any more help, I’ll give you a miss call.
|
Kelkar
|
PM and miss-call? Another joke?
|
Mohan
|
No, I’m serious! Miss call=
Government expenditure on phone bills reduced= fiscal consolidation.
|
Kelkar
|
Whaat an idea sir-ji.
|
Then Vijay Kelkar set
out for a journey to prepare a ‘roadmap’ for fiscal consolidation.
No comments:
Post a Comment